Learning Notes #56 β Push vs Pull Architecture
Today, i learnt about push vs pull architecture, the choice between push and pull architectures can significantly influence system performance, scalability, and user experience. Both approaches have their unique advantages and trade-offs. Understanding these architectures and their ideal use cases can help developers and architects make informed decisions.
What is Push Architecture?
Push architecture is a communication pattern where the server actively sends data to clients as soon as it becomes available. This approach eliminates the need for clients to repeatedly request updates.
How it Works
- The server maintains a connection with the client.
- When new data is available, the server βpushesβ it to the connected clients.
- In a message queue context, producers send messages to a queue, and the queue actively delivers these messages to subscribed consumers without explicit requests.
Examples
- Notifications in Mobile Apps: Users receive instant updates, such as chat messages or alerts.
- Stock Price Updates: Financial platforms use push to provide real-time market data.
- Message Queues with Push Delivery: Systems like RabbitMQ or Kafka configured to push messages to consumers.
- Server-Sent Events (SSE) and WebSockets: These are common implementations of push.
Advantages
- Low Latency: Clients receive updates instantly, improving responsiveness.
- Reduced Redundancy: No need for clients to poll servers frequently, reducing bandwidth consumption.
Challenges
- Complexity: Maintaining open connections, especially for many clients, can be resource-intensive.
- Scalability: Requires robust infrastructure to handle large-scale deployments.
What is Pull Architecture?
Pull architecture involves clients actively requesting data from the server. This pattern is often used when real-time updates are not critical or predictable intervals suffice.
How it Works
- The client periodically sends requests to the server.
- The server responds with the requested data.
- In a message queue context, consumers actively poll the queue to retrieve messages when ready.
Examples
- Web Browsing: A browser sends HTTP requests to fetch pages and resources.
- API Data Fetching: Applications periodically query APIs to update information.
- Message Queues with Pull Delivery: Systems like SQS or Kafka where consumers poll for messages.
- Polling: Regularly checking a server or queue for updates.
Advantages
- Simpler Implementation: No need for persistent connections; standard HTTP requests or queue polling suffice.
- Server Load Control: The server can limit the frequency of client requests to manage resources better.
Challenges
- Latency: Updates are only received when the client requests them, which might lead to delays.
- Increased Bandwidth: Frequent polling can waste resources if no new data is available.
Aspect | Push Architecture | Pull Architecture |
---|---|---|
Latency | Low β Real-time updates | Higher β Dependent on polling frequency |
Complexity | Higher β Requires persistent connections | Lower β Simple request-response model |
Bandwidth Efficiency | Efficient β Updates sent only when needed | Less efficient β Redundant polling possible |
Scalability | Challenging β High client connection overhead | Easier β Controlled client request intervals |
Message Queue Flow | Messages actively delivered to consumers | Consumers poll the queue for messages |
Use Cases | Real-time applications (e.g., chat, live data) | Non-critical updates (e.g., periodic reports) |